« Back to News

AI spells better times ahead for the subject matter experts

It is commonly believed that AI will empower the employees who are willing to learn – others will find it hard to keep their jobs. But there’s an even bigger opportunity for the subject matter experts. They will not only learn the changes being brought about by AI but permanently enrich their jobs by becoming the trainers and administrators of the AI apps.

Firstly, let us understand why a human being – no matter whether she is a subject matter expert or not, is needed to train the modern AI systems.

Human-in-the-loop systems

Humans will be instrumental in building what is known as human-in-the-loop systems.

As per this article by Mothi Venkatesh human-in-the-loop system combines “Supervised Machine Learning” and “Active Learning.” I am reproducing the definition from the article.

HITL=SML+AL

Supervised ML, curated (labeled) data sets used by ML experts to train algorithms by adjusting parameters to make accurate predictions for incoming data.

Active Learningthe data is taken, trained, tuned, tested, and more data is fed back into the algorithm to make it smarter, more confident, and more accurate. This approach–especially feeding data back into a classifier, is called active Learning.

It is obvious that we need a human being where the confidence level in the algorithm is low due to insufficient training data, or the risk associated with an inaccurate inference is very high. But why would we need a subject matter expert? They are not just another “human” augmenting the algorithm’s artificial intelligence.

Subject matter experts as trainers and administrators of AI

This article by Daniel Faggella explains the need for subject matter experts. I am reproducing three ways, as written in the article.

  • Determining the Business Problem an AI solution can solve. For example, let’s say an insurance company wants to become more competitive. A high-level employee at the company, who has been in the industry for more than 20 years, may know from experience that clients often complain about the time it takes to process claims.
  • Determining how AI can solve that business problem. For example, a marketer might tell a data scientist to make sure the model they build can predict the best price to bid for ad space on Google Ad Network without realizing that such an application is nascent in practice and technically challenging. A data scientist would be able to explain this to the marketer, preventing them from promising their team and stakeholders too much.
  • Maintaining and Updating the System Once It’s Built. Take, for example, a manufacturing company with a large number of heavy machinery to maintain. The subject-matter experts collaborate with data scientists to develop an AI system that gathers data from IoT sensors on the machines to predict the optimal time to do preventive maintenance on them.

To understand this better, we need to take a closer look at how the AI apps work.

  1. Every AI app needs training data that needs to be prepared by a human expert. E.g., we need to have a lot of data about the films and the people who watch those films to recommend a bunch of movies to a new user intelligently.
  2. After preparing the training data, a data scientist could use this data to train and test an algorithm. He will repeat this step until he finds a suitable algorithm to generate a model that can predict or infer as precisely as the human expert who has prepared the training data in step 1. This step could take several iterations.
  3. Once the algorithm which can most precisely predict, the same can be used to create a model. This model is handed over to the subject matter expert to be used for predictions or inferences.
  4. The SME uses this model for day to day predictions and inferences. He applies his judgment to decide if the forecasts and inferences are precise enough by comparing what the algorithm has predicted or inferred with what the SME would have done.
  5. If the model is not accurately inferring or predicting, the SME would override the algorithm and manually assign predicted or inferred values.
  6. This edited data is added as new input data, and the same is used to retrain the algorithm. This retraining will ensure better results going forward. The SME repeats steps 4 to 6 with no intervention from the data scientist. The SME would make the application more and more precise. As it becomes more precise, it will more closely mimic the expert’s inferences and predictions.

Who can be a subject matter expert?

You don’t have to be highly placed or academically well qualified. There’s nothing better than years of expertise. E.g., a security guard knows how to spot an intruder in a crowd. He can help a data scientist build an automated threat detection system.

This article was first published here

 

Leave a Reply

About the Writer

  • Vinayak Joglekar
    Co-Founder and CTO, Synerzip

    Vinayak Joglekar is the Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer of Synerzip. Vinayak built and scaled Synerzip’s project teams by attracting and retaining top-notch talent in the fiercely competitive market in India. He took the entrepreneurial leap in 1983 after he quit a programmer-analyst position in Alfa-Laval. Vinayak’s passion for technology skills development drove his ventures in recruitment, training and consulting. He is a certified J2EE programmer and an architect with an active interest in Social, Mobile, Cloud and Big Data technologies. Apart from being the CTO, he mentors bright minds in software development and product delivery. Vinayak has an MBA from Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta and BSME from Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay.

How Can Synerzip Help You?

By partnering with Synerzip, clients rapidly scale their engineering team, decrease time to market and save at least 50 percent with our Agile development teams in India.